Digital printing is a modern technology that has evolved alongside digital advancements. It offers numerous benefits, such as the ability to meet individual needs, print single pages, support variable data, enable instant production, and facilitate network transmission across different locations. However, despite these advantages, the industry still faces challenges. The four traditional printing methods—intaglio (gravure), relief (flexo), planographic (offset), and screen (halftone)—remain dominant in the market due to their established processes and wide usage. The reliance on imported equipment and consumables for digital printing has led to high costs and limited cost-effectiveness, which currently hinders its broader adoption.
Offset printing remains the leading force in the printing industry, especially in packaging. Gravure printing, while widely used, has faced criticism for its environmental impact. Digital printing, though emerging as a promising option, is still in its early stages within the packaging sector. One of its key strengths is its potential for clean production, but its growth depends on technological progress, cost efficiency, and market acceptance.
According to data from the 2012 Drupa exhibition, Israeli entrepreneur Benny Landa introduced a nano-digital printing machine capable of producing up to 50 trillion units annually. Of these, 1 trillion were printed using digital technology, representing about 2% of the total. A 2014 report by Pira Corporation noted that digital printing accounted for 14% of the global and Western European markets, although it remained low in developing countries. In Germany, where the printing industry is well-documented, the market share of different printing technologies in 2012 was: offset at 42%, flexo at 21%, gravure at 13%, digital at 12%, and others at 12%.
In China, digital printing’s share of the overall printing volume is relatively small. According to the State Administration of Press, Publication, Radio, Film and Television, in 2013, the output value of 2,488 main and joint digital printing companies reached 10.3 billion yuan, while the total printing output in the country was 1.03985 trillion yuan. This means that digital printing accounted for just 1% of the total. However, this figure may be underestimated because it doesn’t include all companies using digital printing equipment, such as those engaged in social printing or photocopying. For example, in Shanghai alone, over 11% of printing companies used digital printing equipment, suggesting that the actual output value is higher than reported.
Moreover, the integration of digital and traditional printing in production is becoming more common. For instance, personalized bills are often produced with offset printing for the base design, while digital printing adds variable data. Similarly, pharmaceutical packaging may use offset or flexo printing for the main design, with barcodes added via digital jets. These hybrid processes are often difficult to distinguish in statistical reports, further complicating accurate data collection.
The national printing output value used as a denominator in these calculations may also be inflated, as it includes non-core income. Comparisons between Chinese and U.S. data show significant discrepancies, highlighting the need for more accurate statistics. If we consider a more realistic output value of 415.835 billion yuan for 2012, and assume a digital printing output of 10 billion yuan, the proportion would be around 2.4%. Even if this number increases, it remains far below the 14% seen in Europe and the U.S.
The root cause of this gap is China’s heavy reliance on imported digital printing equipment and materials, which drives up costs and limits affordability. To address this, localization of production and supply chains is essential. The commercial printing sector remains the primary market for digital printing, driven by demand for short runs, personalization, and quick turnaround. While digital printing is slowly entering packaging and textile printing, it still faces competition from traditional methods due to cost and scale limitations.
Despite these challenges, the future of digital printing looks promising. With increasing demand for customization, environmental concerns, and falling equipment prices, the market is expected to grow. Companies like Scodix have already introduced advanced post-press solutions that enhance the visual appeal of printed products. As the industry continues to evolve, the localization of equipment and materials will be crucial to achieving long-term success.
In conclusion, while digital printing has made significant strides, its full potential can only be realized through continued innovation, cost reduction, and market expansion. Packaging and printing companies must adapt to these changes, invest in digital technologies, and prepare for a future where digital solutions become the norm. The road ahead may be challenging, but with the right strategies, the industry is poised for a bright and sustainable future.
Poly DL-lactide-co-glycolide PDLGA
Poly(DL-lactide-co-glycolide) (PDLGA) is an synthetic and biodegradable biomaterial. It is a copolymer based on DL-lactic and glycolic acids. PDLGA has been widely used in drug delivery, such as microspheres.
The CAS Registry number of Poly(L-lactic acid) PLLA is 26780-50-7.
It is white floccule.
What we can do are PDLGA5050,PDLGA7525,PDLGA8515,PDLGA9010,etc.
We can provide Intrinsic viscosity from 0.30-2.25 dl/g, Mw from 6000-30000.
For each batch a certificate of analysis is provided, showing the analytical data determined in our quality control laboratory. Additional analytical data can be made upon request.
When stored in the original packaging at low temperatures (2-8°C), PDLGA keeps its initial properties for at least two years.
Poly DL-lactide-co-glycolide (PDLGA) is a versatile, biodegradable, and biocompatible copolymer widely used in medical, pharmaceutical, and aesthetic applications. As a derivative of polylactic acid (PLA) and polyglycolic acid (PGA), PDLGA offers controlled degradation properties, making it an ideal material for drug delivery systems, sutures, dermal fillers, and tissue engineering.
Key Features & Benefits of PDLGA:
- Biodegradable & Biocompatible – Naturally absorbed by the body over time, reducing the risk of adverse reactions.
- Controlled Degradation Rate – Available in various compositions to tailor the absorption rate for specific applications.
- Widely Used in Aesthetic & Medical Fields – A key component in long-lasting dermal fillers, microspheres, and regenerative medicine.
- Safe & FDA-Approved Material – Used in implantable medical devices, drug carriers, and biodegradable sutures.
- Collagen Stimulation Properties – Supports tissue regeneration and skin rejuvenation in aesthetic treatments.
Applications of PDLGA in Aesthetic & Medical Fields:
- Injectable Dermal Fillers & Biostimulators – Used in PLLA-based fillers to enhance skin elasticity and reduce wrinkles.
- Tissue Engineering & Regenerative Medicine – Applied in bone scaffolds, wound healing materials, and controlled drug release systems.
- Surgical Sutures & Implants – Biodegradable sutures for post-surgical healing and absorbable implants.
- Microspheres for Drug Delivery – Engineered for targeted, controlled medication release in pharmaceuticals.
Innovating Aesthetic & Medical Treatments with PDLGA
As a cutting-edge biomaterial, PDLGA is revolutionizing the fields of aesthetics, regenerative medicine, and drug delivery. Its biodegradability, safety, and effectiveness make it a preferred choice for medical professionals and researchers.
Medical Grade Pdlga,Raw Material Poly Dl-Lactide-Co-Glycolide,Cas 26780-50-7 Polymer,Dl-Lactide-Co-Glycolide
Rimless Industry Co.,Ltd. , https://www.rebornplla.com